AWS CodeCommit VS GitHub
Are you in the market for a new code management solution for your servers? Two major players in the industry are AWS CodeCommit and GitHub. In this blog post, we'll compare the features, pricing, and performance of both options to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Features
Both AWS CodeCommit and GitHub offer a range of features that make code management more efficient and effective. Here's a breakdown of some of the key features of each option:
AWS CodeCommit
- Seamless AWS Integration
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- Free private repositories for up to 5 users
- Integrations with other AWS services
- Encrypted in-transit and at-rest data
- Branch-level permissions
GitHub
- Social Coding Community
- Large Number of Integrations
- Free for public repos
- Private Repositories
- Pull Requests
- Code Reviews
Overall, both options offer many features, but AWS CodeCommit is focused on enterprises with a need for seamless integration with the Amazon Web Services infrastructure. While GitHub is more community-driven and targets open-source and smaller-scale projects.
Pricing
Pricing is a crucial factor in decision-making when it comes to choosing a code management solution for your servers. Here's a comparison of AWS CodeCommit and GitHub pricing:
AWS CodeCommit
- $1 p/month for the first 5 users and 50GB storage
- $0.001 p/month per additional user over 5 users
- $0.06 per GB-month of storage
- $0.09 per GB-month of data transfer
GitHub
- Free for open-source projects
- $4 p/month for individuals
- $7 p/month per user for teams
- $21 p/month per user for enterprise
Pricing can add up quickly, but AWS CodeCommit has an advantage, giving free private repositories for up to 5 users, which GitHub doesn't. But on the other hand, GitHub has the edge when it comes to affordable plans for smaller teams.
Performance
Performance is essential for any code management solution. Here's a comparison of AWS CodeCommit and GitHub's performance:
AWS CodeCommit
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- Geographic distribution
- 2-factor authentication
- Accelerated upload for Amazon EC2 instances
GitHub
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Global and Regional Data Centers
- Two-factor authentication
- Accelerated Git Credential Caching
While both options demonstrate excellent performance, GitHub has a slightly higher uptime SLA with global and regional data centers. Though it's important to note that AWS CodeCommit has its 2-factor authentication and offers accelerated upload for Amazon EC2 instances.
Conclusion
Both AWS CodeCommit and Github have their strengths and weaknesses. So, the choice between them depends on your business needs. AWS CodeCommit is the best choice for large-scale projects and offers seamless integration with other Amazon Web Services. While GitHub is better suited for smaller projects and offers a social coding community experience. When it comes to pricing, AWS CodeCommit wins efficiency hands down with free private repositories for up to 5 users. While GitHub offers affordable plans for smaller teams. So, it's critical to evaluate your business needs and compare the features, pricing, and performance of your available options.